Skip to content
Smart Prize Connect UK

Donald Trump's System of Consequences and Incentives

The ex-president's voracious appetite for revenge has rapidly morphed into a organized framework. Over the past year, the president's rage and whims have taken on the shape of administrative measures similar to reminiscent to earlier authoritarian governments. Federal figures who fail to comply are promptly fired and replaced by supporters. Opposing leaders who confront him risk legal action, court proceedings and punishment. Critics have been categorized under presidential orders as “hostile to national interests”, “anti-Christian” and “anti-capitalist”, and warned with legal action as “extremists”.

The Justice System Remade

Every case involving legal action of political opponents and immunity for his allies displays its own particular features. However, despite their individual form, they embody expressions of what has emerged as a systematic approach. Those episodes are not random. The administration's purge of Department of Justice prosecutors and FBI personnel, alongside his appointment of loyalists in key roles, began swiftly, promptly took on a consistency, and has now been shaped into a structure. DoJ and the law enforcement agency have been restructured into political bodies under his direct orders to implement his demands. Wrongdoing has been made normal. It represents the retribution system.

Administration is more concerned with penalizing the President's perceived adversaries than they are with protecting our national security.

Inside the System

The origin of this framework has been revealed in the legal complaint of three former top FBI agents filed in September in the judicial system in DC against top official a senior appointee and top lawyer another official for unlawful firing in “a effort of revenge against them for what the accused deemed to be a failure to exhibit sufficient allegiance”. According to the filing that a former acting director, the former temporary head, recounts a exchange in which he “publicly confessed the illegality of his actions”.

The official had attempted to shield agency personnel from being dismissed, the lawsuit states. He informed him that “they” – interpreted by him to be the presidential administration and DoJ – had directed him to dismiss everyone who they identified as having been involved in a legal probe against the president. The complaint goes on: “Patel clarified that he had to dismiss the personnel his bosses told him to fire, because his capacity to retain his own position relied on the ouster of the personnel who worked on investigations involving the leader. Patel explained that there was no option he or Driscoll could do to stop these or any other dismissals, because ‘the bureau tried to put the President in jail and he hasn't forgotten it.’” When Driscoll informed Patel he was violating the agency's own internal rules, the director allegedly said “he understood that and he was aware the essence of the summary firings were probably improper”.

Broad Effects

Since Patel's reported confession to Driscoll, the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau have been gutted and redirected for the administration's system of punishment. Several of the FBI's top officials were fired or pushed out in the first days of the government. Approximately numerous professional attorneys at DoJ have taken a “voluntary departure plan”. At least multiple government attorneys, among them those in the Manhattan division, quit in dissent over what they regarded as political interference in withdrawing the criminal prosecution against the city leader, the mayor, in exchange for his collaboration with Trump's Immigration and Customs Enforcement detentions of immigrants. The anti-corruption unit of the department, which oversees misconduct investigations, has been cut down to a handful of lawyers. The civil rights division has been decimated: the majority of its staff has departed. One-third of executives at DoJ have resigned. The unit enforcing environmental law has experienced the exit of 50% its management.

Rewards and Penalties

Regarding the mayor's situation, the temporary lawyer for the federal division, Danielle Sassoon, resigned in protest against what she labeled as the “exchange”. The border official, the president's “enforcement chief,” was present as the enforcer with Adams on Fox News to declare: “Unless he complies, I'll be back in New York City.”. Meanwhile, a former official, formerly the senior DoJ official and a ex-lawyer, who brokered the arrangement, was awarded an appellate federal judgeship, a potential springboard to the judicial branch.

His protection for crimes perpetrated while in government, granted by the extraordinary ruling of the GOP-led on the supreme court, thus blocking his prosecution over the Capitol riot and safeguarding his electoral prospects for the 2024 election, is the cornerstone on which he stands to shield his supporters. With such immunity, he has been freed to permit wrongdoing. The effect of the court judgment permeates his administration and the Republican Party completely. The legal case has metastasized. As the former president's legal adviser he said about the Watergate

About the author

Cheryl Bradley

Freelance writer and prize hunt enthusiast, sharing the best UK competitions.

Smart Prize Connect UK

Type to search articles.